Some of the reaction to the Clintons, whose once-universal support among African-Americans has crashed, is due to the immense stake black Americans have come to invest in the Obama candidacy. But some of this is something else, something more sinister.

Bill and Hillary Clinton are not playing a race card. Rather, the liberal media and some black journalists with sentimental, emotional or ideological investments in Obama are playing the intimidation card.

They are setting limits around what may and may not be said about Obama. They are seeking to censor robust adversarial speech where Barack is concerned, by branding as racists “playing the race card” any who make Barack run the same paces as anyone else.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/race_cards_and_speech_codes.html

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/14/obama-apologizes-for-calling-michigan-tv-reporter-sweetie/

On April 30 at Harvard, completley ignored by the MSM, Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of England, said that Americans must “learn to think inter-continentally.”

Brown rejected the traditional concept of national sovereignty, which means an independent nation not subservient to any outside control, telling us to replace it with “responsible sovereignty,” which he defined as accepting what he calls our global “obligations.” Hold on to your pocketbook.

Brown admitted that his “main argument” is that we must accept “new global rules,” “new global institutions,” and “global networks.” Brown’s global rules include massive U.S. cash handouts and opening U.S. borders to the world.

http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2008/apr08/08-04-30.html

Fortunatley, Brownie might not be around for a while.

http://news.scotsman.com/politics/Most-Labour-backers-want-Brown.4056556.jp

http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/world-masonic-leaders-converge-on-washington-dc-may-7th-2008/

From “Rule by Secrecy” by Jim Marrs:

Of the fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence, only one was known not to be a Freemason, asserted Masonic writer Manly P. Hall, who in The Secret Teachings of All Ages also told of a most mysterious incident at the time of the signing of this historic document.As the debate over their future reached a crescendo and many hesitated to sign the declaration realizing they would be putting their life on the line, suddenly a tall stranger with a pale face spoke out. No one knew who he was or where he came from, but the force of his oration was transfixing. His stirring words ended with the cry, “God has given America to be free!” Amid cheers filled with emotion, every man rushed forward to sign the declaration except the stranger. “He had disappeared,” wrote Hall, “nor was he ever seen again or his identity established.”

Some quotes from Rule by Secrecy: http://www.fdrs.org/jim_marrs_rule_by_secrecy_quotes.html

Marrs long lecture on Rule by Secrecy: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5740371264312136533&q=jim+marrs&ei=z_EgSKr9I5Kc4gK3m8zDAQ

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1931520/John-Bolton-US-should-bomb-Iranian-camps.html

A report in today’s WSJ says that Obama privatley told the Teamsters (IBT) that he would end federal oversight of them, in exchange, the Teamsters gave him their endorsement. Obama is a typical liberal, with policies similar to Hillary’s. They both want more federal regulation over big business. Clinton recently said she wanted to “take” the “windfall profits” of big oil and put them into a strategic energy fund or something like that; I wouldn’t necisarily be against taxing oils profits a bunch and giving the money back to the American people in a tax rebate, but anyway back to my main point: the two main Democrats are all about the oversight when it comes to big business. Obama’s entire candidacy has been based on the notion that he doesn’t do politics as usual, and is not beholden to the special interests. This report shows that is not the case, and Obama is a typical Democrat who get on their knees and kiss the feet of the unions (and IBT is just a start, the Democratic party’s relationship with the teachers unions is similar, causing shitty schools, and forcing kids into them without a chance to use a voucher to go to a better school).

Why is federal oversight (or some type of oversight for you Federalists) of unions imperative? Because the unions (especially IBT) are in league with the mob and commit crimes all the time to influence outcomes. This damages the market.

Another reason for the Teamster’s endorsement was that Obama supported the “Employee Free Choice Act” (This is kind of a 1984 type deal, where the ministry names mean the exact opposite). This act makes balloting in unions public, so all your co-workers, bosses, and mafia legbreakers can see you voted against something the union wanted. Absolutley ridiculous.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/05/05/politics/horserace/entry4071394.shtml

http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/05/why-did-the-teamsters-endorse-obama/

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/opinion/05kristol.html?hp

http://www.newsweek.com/id/135380

1. AP: “US Report says AQ Gaining Strength.” by Matthew Lee. http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j3OfYY31yv9LNOspwKcj73SwDegwD90CCOO00

2. Jerusalem Post. “US: Iran most active sponsor of terror”. by Hilary Leila Kreiger. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1208870534823&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull