DC Madam Suicide, CIA Man Killed by Houston PD Related?

On April 29, Roland Carnaby was shot dead by Houston Police after fleeing from them after a traffic stop. He was pulled over initially and gave the police his CIA ID card. The cops supervisor told them that it was fake and to find a reason to arrest Carnaby. Carnaby then fled in his vehicle from the traffic stop, and attempted to call his contacts in the Houston PD and FBI while being chased by cops. He was later stopped somehow. “Enraged” Houston Police officers busted out his window and shot him to death as he was trying to get out of his car.

A seperate report from Paul Joseph Watson on Prison Planet, states that Carnaby was investigating reports that two of the 9/11 hijackers used a boat owned by Jack Abramoff in the days before 9/11.

How does this possibly relate to the D.C. Madam, Deborah Jean Palfrey? Apparently Palfrey ran her prostitution ring out of McLean, Virginia in the year before 9/11. Watson’s article says that Palfrey said her ring was used as an intelligence operation to gather information from the no-doubt important people who used it. McLean, Virginia is near CIA and the Pentagon.

Now both Carnaby and Palfrey die suspiciously within a week of each other. Add to this that basically no national media outlets have reported the Carnaby story, this seems extemely suspicious. Which brings me back to this question: why did Carnaby run from the cops. It is interesting, based on the summary of the incident, that despite having a legit CIA ID, the cop was told by a supervisor that is was fake, and to try to find a reason to arrest Carnaby. The article makes the obvious point: couldn’t they just arrest him for the fake ID? Obviously Carnaby feared something more than a couple hours in lockup, that is why he ran.

Notes: Carnaby was the President of the Houston chapter of the Association of Intelligenece Officers (AFIO).

http://genedios.livejournal.com/3427.html

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2008/050508_conspiracy_connection.htm

Gordon Brown Calls for End to American Sovereignty

On April 30 at Harvard, completley ignored by the MSM, Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of England, said that Americans must “learn to think inter-continentally.”

Brown rejected the traditional concept of national sovereignty, which means an independent nation not subservient to any outside control, telling us to replace it with “responsible sovereignty,” which he defined as accepting what he calls our global “obligations.” Hold on to your pocketbook.

Brown admitted that his “main argument” is that we must accept “new global rules,” “new global institutions,” and “global networks.” Brown’s global rules include massive U.S. cash handouts and opening U.S. borders to the world.

http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2008/apr08/08-04-30.html

Fortunatley, Brownie might not be around for a while.

http://news.scotsman.com/politics/Most-Labour-backers-want-Brown.4056556.jp

Freemason’s Gather in D.C.

http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/world-masonic-leaders-converge-on-washington-dc-may-7th-2008/

From “Rule by Secrecy” by Jim Marrs:

Of the fifty-six signers of the Declaration of Independence, only one was known not to be a Freemason, asserted Masonic writer Manly P. Hall, who in The Secret Teachings of All Ages also told of a most mysterious incident at the time of the signing of this historic document.As the debate over their future reached a crescendo and many hesitated to sign the declaration realizing they would be putting their life on the line, suddenly a tall stranger with a pale face spoke out. No one knew who he was or where he came from, but the force of his oration was transfixing. His stirring words ended with the cry, “God has given America to be free!” Amid cheers filled with emotion, every man rushed forward to sign the declaration except the stranger. “He had disappeared,” wrote Hall, “nor was he ever seen again or his identity established.”

Hall said this episode paralleled similar incidents in world history, when strange unknown men suddenly appeared just in time for the creation of some new nation. “Are they coincidences,” he asked, “or do they demonstrate that the divine wisdom of the Ancient Mysteries is still present in the world, serving mankind as it did of old?” p. 232

 

 

I read “Rule by Secrecy” and have seen Youtube lectures by Marrs, it was a while ago though. Here are some Jim Marrs links that could possibly blow your mind.

Some quotes from Rule by Secrecy: http://www.fdrs.org/jim_marrs_rule_by_secrecy_quotes.html

Marrs long lecture on Rule by Secrecy: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5740371264312136533&q=jim+marrs&ei=z_EgSKr9I5Kc4gK3m8zDAQ

Bolton: U.S. Should Bomb Iranian Insurgent Camps

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1931520/John-Bolton-US-should-bomb-Iranian-camps.html

Obama: I Will Be Organized Labor’s Bitch

A report in today’s WSJ says that Obama privatley told the Teamsters (IBT) that he would end federal oversight of them, in exchange, the Teamsters gave him their endorsement. Obama is a typical liberal, with policies similar to Hillary’s. They both want more federal regulation over big business. Clinton recently said she wanted to “take” the “windfall profits” of big oil and put them into a strategic energy fund or something like that; I wouldn’t necisarily be against taxing oils profits a bunch and giving the money back to the American people in a tax rebate, but anyway back to my main point: the two main Democrats are all about the oversight when it comes to big business. Obama’s entire candidacy has been based on the notion that he doesn’t do politics as usual, and is not beholden to the special interests. This report shows that is not the case, and Obama is a typical Democrat who get on their knees and kiss the feet of the unions (and IBT is just a start, the Democratic party’s relationship with the teachers unions is similar, causing shitty schools, and forcing kids into them without a chance to use a voucher to go to a better school).

Why is federal oversight (or some type of oversight for you Federalists) of unions imperative? Because the unions (especially IBT) are in league with the mob and commit crimes all the time to influence outcomes. This damages the market.

Another reason for the Teamster’s endorsement was that Obama supported the “Employee Free Choice Act” (This is kind of a 1984 type deal, where the ministry names mean the exact opposite). This act makes balloting in unions public, so all your co-workers, bosses, and mafia legbreakers can see you voted against something the union wanted. Absolutley ridiculous.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/05/05/politics/horserace/entry4071394.shtml

http://polhudson.lohudblogs.com/2008/05/05/why-did-the-teamsters-endorse-obama/

Kristol: McCain-Jindal?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/opinion/05kristol.html?hp

Zakaria: The Post-American World

http://www.newsweek.com/id/135380

News Roundup April 30

1. AP: “US Report says AQ Gaining Strength.” by Matthew Lee. http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j3OfYY31yv9LNOspwKcj73SwDegwD90CCOO00

2. Jerusalem Post. “US: Iran most active sponsor of terror”. by Hilary Leila Kreiger. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1208870534823&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Barack Disowns Wright

Obviously he has weighed the political costs and chosen (reluctantly) to break from the church. Get ready for two weeks of great press for Obama. MSNBC’s Hardball and Race for the White House were fawning over Obama’s “courageous decision”.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/04/29/obama.wright/index.html

Iran-led Radicals Getting Stronger, Israel Warns

AFP Report on Raw Story:

http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Iran_led_radicals_getting_stronger__04282008.html